Workman Law

Rodrigues v. Charming Charlie

Class Claims Settled

Plaintiff contends that Defendant failed to timely pay her and all other aggrieved employees all earned regular and overtime wages and failed to provide her and all other aggrieved employees with meal periods and compensation for work without meal periods.  As a consequence, Plaintiff contends that Defendant failed to provide her and all other aggrieved employees with accurate wage statements in violation of California law..  Plaintiff contends that the wage statements did not display all regular and overtime hours worked and the respective compensation earned for those hours, and did not display compensation owed for work without meal periods.  In addition, Plaintiff contends that Defendant failed to provide physical copies of the wage statements to her and other aggrieved employees.

The class action claims brought by Ms. Rodrigues were consolidated with the case of Battle v. Charming Charlie. The parties have reached a settlement with respect to class action claims and a hearing for preliminary approval of the settlement is scheduled for June 12, 2015.  On September 25, 2015, the Court granted final approval of the class action settlement.

 

Case Blog

achat cialis generique Effets du tadalafil pour la PDE5 est plus actif que les autres phosphodiestérase tadalafil est en 10 000 fois plus puissant sur la PDE5 que pour FDE1, PDE2 et PDE4, qui sont situés dans le cœur, le cerveau, les vaisseaux sanguins, le foie et d'autres orga